27 Best Mac EMR Software For 2024
10 Best Mac EMR Software Shortlist
Here's my pick of the 10 best software from the 27 tools reviewed.
Our one-on-one guidance will help you find the perfect fit.
Mac EMRs are tailored to the unique ecosystem of Mac OS, iOS, iPad, and iPhone. Not only does the software need to be compatible, it needs to comply with standards set by ONC-ATCB, support meaningful use, and be capable of handling ambulatory and multi-specialty needs. Also, Mac EMR software simplifies demographics management, enhances patient chart handling, and ensures compliance with MACRA and MIPS - all crucial for running a successful practice.
Navigating the landscape of health record software can be daunting, especially when juggling numerous responsibilities in behavioral health or any other healthcare setting. Moreover, these tools address the pain points with their reliable, intuitive, and comprehensive features. Having an EMR system that seamlessly integrates into your workflow makes a world of difference. Now, let's dive in and explore some of the best options for Mac EMR software.
What Is Mac EMR Software?
Mac EMR (Electronic Medical Record) software refers to specialized digital tools designed for use on Macintosh operating systems, aiding healthcare professionals in capturing, storing, and utilizing patient health information. From solo practitioners to large hospital networks, a wide array of healthcare providers employ this technology to streamline administrative tasks, improve patient care, ensure regulatory compliance, and optimize overall operational efficiency.
Also, leveraging Mac EMR software enables healthcare providers to access patient records with a click, schedule appointments, manage billing, and even facilitate telehealth consultations, demonstrating an indispensable shift towards a tech-powered future in healthcare.
Best Mac EMR Software Summary
| Tools | Price | |
|---|---|---|
| WebPT | From $3/user/month (billed annually) | Website |
| Kareo | From $110/user/month | Website |
| athenahealth | Pricing upon request | Website |
| PracticeSuite | From $29/user/month | Website |
| CollaborateMD | From $279/user/month | Website |
| Eyefinity | From $350/user/month. | Website |
| MacPractice | From $400/user/month. | Website |
| TherapyNotes | From $59/user/month | Website |
| ClinicMinds | From $129/user/month | Website |
| Augmedix | Pricing upon request | Website |
Compare Software Specs Side by Side
Use our comparison chart to review and evaluate software specs side-by-side.
Compare SoftwareBest Mac EMR Software Reviews
WebPT
Best for physical therapy practices seeking cloud-based solutions
WebPT provides a cloud-based EMR system that is specifically geared toward physical therapy clinics. Its focus on this niche and ease of use make it an optimal choice for physical therapy practices seeking a dedicated solution.
Why I Picked WebPT: I picked WebPT for its specialized focus on physical therapy practices. It stands out because it's not a generic healthcare software but is tailored to the unique needs of physical therapists. That's why I determined it to be the 'Best for physical therapy practices seeking all-in-one cloud-based solutions.'
Standout features & integrations:
WebPT also offers comprehensive scheduling, billing, and clinical documentation features that are specific to physical therapy. Moreover, it integrates with various billing and telehealth platforms, simplifying administrative tasks for therapy practices.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Affordable starting price for small practices
- Broad integration options with billing and telehealth platforms
- Specialized focus on physical therapy needs
Cons:
- Learning curve for those unfamiliar with EMR systems
- Annual billing could be a drawback for some practices
- More advanced features may require additional payment
Kareo offers a comprehensive web-based/Saas healthcare platform, focusing on providing a streamlined experience for independent practices. Its solutions range from electronic health records (EHR) to practice management and billing, with a significant emphasis on the seamless integration of these components.
Why I Picked Kareo: I selected Kareo because it provides a suite of tools that are seamlessly integrated, making it stand out from many of its competitors. Considering this, I deemed it as 'Best for independent practices valuing seamless integration.' Independent practices often deal with multiple software, and Kareo's ability to integrate different functionalities can save significant time and reduce potential errors.
Standout features & integrations:
Some of the standout features of Kareo include its patient portal, telemedicine capabilities, and mobile application. The patient portal allows for easy patient communication and appointment scheduling, while the telemedicine feature expands the practice's reach. Its integration capabilities stand out, especially its seamless connection with in-house billing, EHR, and patient engagement tools.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Features such as telemedicine and a patient portal enhance patient care
- Excellent integration capabilities
- Comprehensive suite of tools covering multiple aspects of a practice
Cons:
- As with any EHR, there's a learning curve to use it effectively
- Some users may find the array of features overwhelming
- Pricing may be a bit steep for smaller practices
Athenahealth offers a robust healthcare platform focusing on creating an interconnected care network. Its solutions encompass electronic health records (EHR), practice management, patient engagement, and care coordination. The key selling point is its cloud-based platform's ability to effectively manage a vast network of care providers, which directly relates to its standing as best for interconnected care network management.
Why I Picked Athenahealth: When choosing the best healthcare software, the extensive networking capabilities of Athenahealth made it stand out from other competitors. I found it to be the best for interconnected care network management due to its focus on creating an expansive care network, making it possible to deliver a coordinated and efficient care experience.
Standout features & integrations:
Athenahealth’s platform includes a range of noteworthy features like electronic health records, patient engagement tools, and billing services. The standout feature is its ability to create an interconnected network of care providers, which greatly enhances coordination and efficiency. As for integrations, Athenahealth works well with a variety of systems, including billing and laboratory management tools.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Offers seamless integration with a variety of other tools
- The interconnected network feature enhances care coordination
- Robust suite of tools covering multiple aspects of healthcare management
Cons:
- There's a learning curve to effectively utilize all its capabilities
- The vast range of features might be overwhelming for some users
- Pricing information is not readily available, which might deter some potential users
PracticeSuite is a holistic medical practice management software offering a wide range of functionalities. It also excels in providing comprehensive revenue cycle management, a vital component of medical practice operations that directly impacts financial health.
Why I Picked PracticeSuite: My selection of PracticeSuite was driven by its comprehensive approach to revenue cycle management (RCM). Also, In comparing many medical management tools, PracticeSuite stood out with its efficient handling of every phase of the revenue cycle, from appointment scheduling to insurance claim processing. This level of detailed attention to revenue operations justifies its position as the best choice for comprehensive revenue cycle management.
Standout features & integrations:
Key features of PracticeSuite include intuitive patient scheduling, robust electronic health record (EHR) management, and an in-depth billing module. The software also excels in providing detailed analytics that allows for thorough financial management. When it comes to integrations, PracticeSuite doesn't disappoint, with compatibility with leading EHR systems, clearinghouses for billing, and laboratories for seamless data exchange.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Detailed analytics for financial management
- Strong suite of integrations with other healthcare systems
- Comprehensive revenue cycle management features
Cons:
- Annual billing may deter practices seeking more flexible payment terms
- Steeper learning curve for those new to medical billing
- Some users may find the interface somewhat dated
CollaborateMD is a medical billing and practice management solution that assists in streamlining healthcare processes, including claim management and tracking. By offering features to simplify the complexities associated with medical billing, it becomes an effective tool for seamless claim management and tracking.
Why I Picked CollaborateMD: Choosing CollaborateMD for the list came down to its distinct ability to blend practice management and medical billing processes effectively. Its standout attribute is also its commitment to mitigating claim rejections and denials, enabling efficient tracking and management. Based on these capabilities, I judge it as the 'Best for seamless claim management and tracking.'
Standout features & integrations:
Key features include real-time claim tracking, an intelligent billing rules engine, and robust reporting capabilities. Its most important integrations include electronic health record (EHR) systems, practice management platforms, and clearinghouses, thus providing a comprehensive workflow.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Strong integration capabilities with EHR systems
- Intelligent billing rules engine for efficient processing
- Real-time claim tracking for immediate status updates
Cons:
- Customer service might be inconsistent as per some user reviews
- The learning curve can be steep for newcomers
- Higher starting price compared to other similar tools
Eyefinity is a practice management and EHR software designed for ophthalmology practices. With specific features for eye care, it assists in enhancing patient care, managing operations, and even assisting with billing and coding.
Why I Picked Eyefinity: Eyefinity caught my attention because it's specifically designed for ophthalmology, which sets it apart from generic EHR systems. This specialization allows it to provide unique features that meet the needs of eye care professionals. Therefore, I see it as the 'Best for specialized ophthalmology practices'.
Standout features & integrations:
Eyefinity includes a comprehensive EHR system, practice management tools, e-prescription, and an integrated optical retail management system. Additionally, it offers built-in telemedicine capabilities, and patient engagement features such as appointment reminders. The software integrates with popular e-prescribing (eRx) platforms and optical labs.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Comprehensive feature set including telemedicine
- Integrated optical retail management system
- Specialization in ophthalmology
Cons:
- May require a learning curve due to the comprehensive features
- High cost compared to general-purpose EHRs
- Less useful for non-ophthalmology practices
MacPractice offers a powerful suite of tools explicitly tailored for Mac-based healthcare environments. It stands out for its ability to seamlessly integrate various aspects of clinic operations, making it the top choice for Mac-oriented practices seeking a unified solution.
Why I Picked MacPractice: I chose MacPractice primarily for its seamless integration capabilities within the Mac ecosystem. Its harmonious co-existence with Mac-based environments distinguishes it from others on the list. This compatibility, coupled with an array of features that facilitate clinic operations, makes it the best choice for practices that are deeply rooted in the Mac infrastructure.
Standout features & integrations:
MacPractice excels in offering a robust set of features including but not limited to patient registration, appointment scheduling, billing, and detailed reporting. The software’s patient portal and electronic health record (EHR) functionalities are also noteworthy. In terms of integrations, MacPractice aligns with several crucial platforms such as laboratories, pharmacies, imaging centers, and more, ensuring comprehensive and interconnected healthcare delivery.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Strong suite of integrations with key healthcare platforms
- Broad set of features supporting clinic operations
- Tailored for optimal performance on Mac infrastructure
Cons:
- Limited support for non-Mac systems
- Initial setup might be complex for non-tech savvy users
- Steeper price point compared to other options
TherapyNotes is a comprehensive practice management system, primarily designed for mental health professionals. With a keen emphasis on aiding robust mental health practices, this software provides features that align perfectly with the unique needs of therapists, psychologists, psychiatrists, and other mental health practitioners.
Why I Picked TherapyNotes: Among the plethora of EMR software options available, I chose TherapyNotes due to its dedicated focus on mental health practices. While many solutions provide generic features, TherapyNotes tailors its services to the specific needs of mental health professionals, thus earning its reputation as the best tool for managing robust mental health practices. Its suite of features caters to practitioners aiming for a streamlined workflow without sacrificing any nuances of their practice.
Standout features & integrations:
TherapyNotes shines with its specialty-specific note templates, easy scheduling, billing, and robust reporting features. These elements also combine to offer a smooth user experience, and the secure telehealth platform only enhances its service delivery. Integrations are also an important part of TherapyNotes, with significant connections including medical billing software and clearinghouse services, a HIPAA-compliant patient portal, and seamless credit card processing.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Extensive integrations with billing and clearinghouse services
- Robust telehealth capabilities
- Specialty-specific features cater to mental health professionals
Cons:
- The user interface may require a slight learning curve for new users
- Lacks integrations with some common third-party apps
- Higher starting price compared to some competitors
Clinicminds streamlines and simplifies the unique workflows encountered in aesthetic and cosmetic clinics. It's a tool designed with the specific needs of this niche in mind, excelling in managing appointments, consultations, treatments, and payments.
Why I Picked Clinicminds: I chose Clinicminds for its keen focus on aesthetic clinics. Not many tools offer this specialized approach, and that's what sets it apart. It stands out as the best for aesthetic clinic workflow optimization because it understands the unique needs and challenges of this niche and directly addresses them with tailored features.
Standout features & integrations:
Clinicminds offers a rich set of features including advanced scheduling, customer relationship management, and reporting. Its standout feature is a streamlined booking system that allows both office and online appointment bookings, an integral aspect for aesthetic clinics. As for integrations, Clinicminds pairs well with several payment processors and third-party software, enhancing convenience and efficiency.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Integrates well with payment processors and third-party software
- Streamlined booking system
- Designed specifically for aesthetic clinics
Cons:
- Higher price point compared to general EMR software
- May offer more features than some clinics require
- Not optimal for general practices
Augmedix is a platform designed to alleviate the administrative burden on healthcare professionals through remote scribing services. It also has redefined multitasking for physicians by taking note-taking off their plates, which is why it's best for enhancing physician productivity and profitability through remote scribing.
Why I Picked Augmedix: I chose Augmedix for its unique approach to healthcare professional support. Augmedix stands out due to its focus on remote scribing, a feature not common in many similar tools. This standout feature is why I picked it as the 'Best for physician productivity through remote scribing.'
Standout features & integrations:
Augmedix offers real-time, accurate medical note-taking, performed by trained professionals. It also integrates with various electronic health records (EHRs) to automatically update patient information, reducing manual work.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Increases patient-physician interaction time by reducing administrative tasks
- Seamless integration with various EHRs
- Real-time medical scribing services enhance physician productivity
Cons:
- Limited to English-language scribing services
- Dependency on the scribe's knowledge and accuracy
- High starting price can be a barrier for small practices
Other Mac EMR Software
Below is a list of additional Mac EMR software that I shortlisted, but did not make it to the top 10. Definitely worth checking them out.
- iPrescribe
For secure electronic prescription services
- Experity
For urgent care clinic workflow acceleration
- SimplePractice
Good for health and wellness professionals seeking online practice management
- Pabau
Good for CRM and business management in healthcare sector
- NikoHealth
Good for remote patient monitoring and telehealth
- PatientNow
Good for aesthetic medical practices needing client management
- Synchromedics
Good for tracking patient progress over time
- CentralReach
Good for therapy practice management and data collection
- Embark EMR
Good for veterinary medicine with pet health record management
- VaxCare
Good for automating vaccine inventory management
- Praxis EMR
Good for AI-based clinical charting and EHR
- NextGEN
Good for fully integrated EHR and practice management solutions
- Therapia
Good for scheduling home physiotherapy appointments
- Net Health
Good for specialized outpatient care management
- RXTN
Good for customizable cloud-based EHR systems
- TriMedTech
Good for automated patient appointment scheduling
- Physimed EMR
Good for managing patient medical records and scheduling
Selection Criteria For Mac EMR Software
In my extensive experience testing and evaluating electronic health record (EHR) software, I have identified a few key factors that determine the effectiveness of these tools. These factors pertain to the tool's core functionalities, key features, and usability. Here are the critical aspects I've evaluated for the tools mentioned in this review:
Core Functionality
- Patient record management: The tool should allow easy organization, storage, and retrieval of patient records.
- Scheduling: This pertains to the ability to schedule appointments, with automatic reminders to both patients and clinicians.
- Billing and invoicing: The tool should have a feature to manage billing and invoicing, making it easy to track payments and dues.
Key Features
- Interoperability: The tool should be able to communicate and exchange data with other healthcare systems or software to maintain a seamless workflow.
- Customizability: The tool should allow customization to cater to specific needs of the practice, like custom forms, fields, or workflows.
- Compliance: Given the sensitive nature of health information, the tool must comply with necessary regulations, such as HIPAA.
Usability
- Interface: The tool's interface should be intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for healthcare providers to navigate and use the system without requiring extensive training.
- Onboarding and training: Given the complexity of EHR systems, the vendor should provide sufficient resources and training to help users understand and utilize the system to its full potential.
- Customer support: Quick and efficient customer support is vital, as any disruption in the system can negatively impact patient care. The vendor should provide prompt assistance to resolve issues and queries.
Most Common Questions Regarding Mac EMR Software (FAQ's)
What are the benefits of using Mac EMR software?
Mac Electronic Medical Records software provides several advantages.
- It streamlines patient record management, reducing errors, and increasing efficiency.
- It improves patient care by providing real-time access to patient records, enabling informed decision-making.
- It facilitates easy scheduling of appointments, improving practice workflow.
- It eases billing and invoicing, thus helping to manage the financial aspect of the practice.
- Many of these tools comply with necessary healthcare regulations, ensuring the secure handling of sensitive patient data.
How much does Mac EMR software cost?
The cost of Mac EMR software varies significantly based on its functionalities, the size of the healthcare practice, and the vendor.
What are the typical pricing models for Mac EMR software?
Most Mac EMR software solutions follow a subscription-based pricing model, where you pay a recurring fee, usually monthly or annually. This fee may be per user or per provider. Some vendors may also charge a one-time implementation or setup fee.
What is the typical range of pricing for Mac EMR software?
Pricing can start as low as $10 per user per month for basic plans and can go up to hundreds of dollars per user per month for advanced plans with more features. Some high-end, enterprise-level solutions may cost even more.
Which is the cheapest and the most expensive Mac EMR software?
SimplePractice is one of the most affordable options, with pricing starting at $39 per user per month. On the other hand, tools like Athenahealth and eClinicalWorks, which cater to larger practices and offer a wide range of features, tend to be at the higher end of the pricing spectrum.
Are there any free Mac EMR software options?
While most Mac EMR software comes with a cost, there are a few free trial options available, like OpenEMR and DrChrono. However, these free versions may lack advanced features and integrations found in paid software.
More Mac EMR Software Reviews
Summary
In conclusion, choosing the right Mac EMR software is crucial for the efficient running of your healthcare practice. There are several options available in the market, each with its unique selling proposition. While some excel at managing a high volume of patient records, others stand out with their seamless integration capabilities. And then there are those which shine with their interconnected care network management functionalities.
Key Takeaways:
- Understand Your Requirements: Assess your needs and requirements before you start your search for the right Mac EMR software. Know what specific functionalities and features are most important to you. This will narrow down your options and help you focus on the most suitable solutions.
- Consider Usability: The design, ease of onboarding, interface, and customer support play a significant role in the usability of the software. An intuitive and user-friendly interface can save your team a lot of time and make the transition to a new system smoother.
- Budget and Pricing: Be clear about your budget and consider the pricing model of the software. Some software charges per user or provider while others may have a flat fee. Remember, the cheapest option may not necessarily be the best. Look for software that offers good value for money, keeping in mind the benefits and efficiencies it brings to your practice.
What Do You Think?
I've tried to include a wide variety of the best Mac EMR software in this list, but I know there are many more out there. If there's a tool that you love and you don't see it here, please share it with me!
I'm always eager to explore new options and update this list to make it as comprehensive and useful as possible. Your input is highly valued and could help other readers find the perfect EMR software for their needs.