Skip to main content

This software is essentially an electronic health record (EHR) software option that offers similar or enhanced features compared to Practice Fusion. The benefits of such a tool are immense; it supports meaningful use, aiding healthcare providers to improve care quality, safety, and efficiency. This software significantly alleviates common pain points such as complex patient scheduling, billing hurdles, and securely maintaining patient records. Feel free to explore these options or visit website and find what suits your needs best.

Why Look For A Practice Fusion Alternative?

Practice Fusion alternatives essentially serve as comprehensive Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems, catering to a variety of healthcare practices ranging from small clinics to large hospitals. They aid healthcare professionals in patient management, streamlining workflows, maintaining health records, billing, and improving overall practice efficiency. So, who are these alternatives for?

They're for professionals who are looking to augment their practice with features beyond what Practice Fusion offers or simply seeking a more tailored solution. Perhaps Practice Fusion's interface doesn't resonate with your team, or maybe you need a system with more specialized functions for your unique field, or it could be that you're looking for superior customer support. These are valid reasons to explore alternatives, as they can potentially offer a better fit for your needs, enabling your practice to thrive.

Best Practice Fusion Alternative Summary

Tools Price
EHR Your Way From $40/user/month (billed annually)
WebPT From $3/user/month (billed annually)
Kareo From $110/user/month
eClinicalWorks From $449/user/month
DrChrono From $199/user/month (billed annually)
Cerner Pricing upon request
NextGEN From $299/user/month, (billed annually).
PowerDiary From $27/user/month (billed annually)
Luminello From $39/user/month
Epic Pricing upon request
Compare Software Specs Side by Side

Compare Software Specs Side by Side

Use our comparison chart to review and evaluate software specs side-by-side.

Compare Software

Best Practice Fusion Alternative Reviews

Best for custom workflows and templates

  • From $40/user/month (billed annually)
Visit Website
Rating: 4.7/5

EHR Your Way is a versatile healthcare management system, aimed at creating a streamlined workflow with an emphasis on customization. It's designed to match the unique rhythm of your practice, which makes it exceptional for those seeking a tool that effortlessly adapts to custom workflows and templates.

Why it's a good Practice Fusion alternative:

I selected EHR Your Way for this list due to its standout flexibility and adaptability. Not all practices operate the same, and EHR Your Way acknowledges this, offering customization that makes it an appealing Practice Fusion alternative. It stands out in its ability to tailor to your practice's workflows, which I determined makes it best for those who prioritize customization in their EHR systems.

Standout features and integrations:

EHR Your Way comes packed with features that serve a variety of needs. From its voice recognition feature for quicker note-taking to its fully customizable forms and templates, it also tailors to the specific demands of your practice. Additionally, it offers noteworthy integrations with medical billing services, pharmacies for e-prescribing, and labs for efficient data management.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Offers significant integrations with other healthcare services
  • Feature-rich with tools like voice recognition for notes
  • Highly customizable to fit specific workflows

Cons:

  • Higher cost when compared to some other alternatives
  • Initial setup and customization can be time-consuming
  • The interface might seem outdated to some users

Best for physical therapists seeking streamlined practice management

  • From $3/user/month (billed annually)
Visit Website
Rating: 4.4/5

WebPT provides a specialized, comprehensive EHR solution designed specifically for the world of physical therapy. As such, it's uniquely equipped to handle the distinct needs of physical therapists desiring a streamlined approach to practice management.

Why it's a good Practice Fusion alternative:

In my process of selection, WebPT emerged as a clear choice for its industry-specific solution. As a Practice Fusion alternative, it shines in its ability to address the unique needs of physical therapists, which often are not adequately catered to in more generalized EHR systems. Therefore, I deemed it the best for physical therapists who need a more tailored and streamlined approach to practice management.

Standout features and integrations:

WebPT boasts features such as a physical therapy-specific documentation platform, robust scheduling tools, and a sophisticated billing software. Its integrations are particularly valuable, including ones with exercise software, imaging platforms, and various billing services, designed to facilitate a smoother, more integrated therapy practice.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Strong scheduling and billing tools
  • Robust integrations with physical therapy-specific software
  • Tailored to the specific needs of physical therapists

Cons:

  • Initial setup may require dedicated time and effort
  • Might lack some features relevant for broader healthcare practices
  • Daily pricing model may not be preferred by all clinics

Best for independent practices needing efficient billing solutions

  • Free demo available
  • From $110/user/month
Visit Website
Rating: 4/5

Kareo is a cloud-based medical technology platform designed to assist independent medical practices. It offers a suite of applications, including an integrated electronic health records (EHR) system, practice management, and a billing solution that streamlines the revenue cycle management process.

Why it's a good Practice Fusion alternative:

When selecting an alternative to Practice Fusion, Kareo's strength in providing efficient billing solutions for independent practices caught my attention. In comparison to other platforms, Kareo offers a particularly comprehensive and user-friendly approach to billing, making it an excellent choice for independent practices that require strong financial management tools. In my judgment, this quality makes Kareo the best tool for practices seeking an efficient billing solution.

Standout features and integrations:

Key features of Kareo include patient scheduling, insurance and patient billing, reporting and analytics, and electronic claims processing. The software also integrates seamlessly with other popular platforms such as Microsoft Office, Dropbox, and QuickBooks, facilitating easy transfer of information and streamlining operations.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Robust support and training resources
  • Wide range of integrations
  • Comprehensive billing solutions

Cons:

  • Interface can be complex for beginners
  • Lacks some advanced features found in other systems
  • Higher starting price compared to some alternatives

Best for telehealth and patient engagement modules

  • From $449/user/month
Visit Website
Rating: 3.6/5

eClinicalWorks is an EHR software providing a combination of cloud-based solutions that streamline clinical, administrative, and financial operations. It excels in its telehealth and patient engagement capabilities, making it an excellent option for practices prioritizing these areas.

Why it's a good Practice Fusion alternative:

I selected eClinicalWorks as an alternative to Practice Fusion due to its robust telehealth and patient engagement modules. It differentiates itself with features that seamlessly connect patients and doctors remotely, and engage patients in their health journey. I hold the opinion that it's best for those focusing on telehealth and patient engagement because it leverages technology to maintain and enhance patient-practice relationships.

Standout features and integrations:

The strength of eClinicalWorks lies in its comprehensive telehealth capabilities and a robust patient portal. It also facilitates easy patient-provider communication and manages virtual appointments effectively. It integrates smoothly with lab systems, pharmacies, and hospital networks to ensure a coordinated and efficient healthcare delivery.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Smooth integrations with other healthcare systems
  • Effective patient engagement tools
  • Robust telehealth features

Cons:

  • Additional costs may apply for certain features
  • Customer support could be improved
  • The user interface may seem complex to new users

Best for medical practices looking for a mobile-optimized EHR

  • Free demo available
  • From $199/user/month (billed annually)
Visit Website
Rating: 3.5/5

DrChrono is an EHR (Electronic Health Record) software designed with a mobile-first approach. It offers robust medical practice management, medical billing, and patient engagement services that can be accessed efficiently through mobile devices. This mobile-optimized design makes it an excellent option for medical practices that require on-the-go accessibility.

Why it's a good Practice Fusion alternative:

In my process of selecting the best alternatives to Practice Fusion, DrChrono was chosen for its emphasis on mobile optimization. Unlike many other EHR systems, it stands out by offering a user-friendly interface that is optimized for use on mobile devices. This emphasis on mobile optimization makes it best suited for medical practices that often need to access and update health records while on the move.

Standout features and integrations:

Some of DrChrono's most noteworthy features include streamlined scheduling, customizable medical forms, patient portal, and real-time insurance eligibility checks. The software also offers key integrations with numerous third-party applications, such as medical billing services, telehealth platforms, and electronic prescription services.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Integrated patient portal for better patient engagement
  • Customizable medical forms can accommodate various specialties
  • Mobile-optimized design allows easy on-the-go access

Cons:

  • Limited telehealth features in the basic plan
  • Customization options can be complex for new users
  • Higher cost compared to some other EHR platforms

Best for advanced clinical decision support tools

  • Pricing upon request

Cerner offers a comprehensive EHR platform designed to provide advanced decision support for clinicians. It blends data-driven insights and intelligent workflows to transform the clinical experience.

Why it's a good Practice Fusion alternative:

My decision to include Cerner as a Practice Fusion alternative was guided by its superior decision support capabilities. Also, it excels at providing clinicians with real-time, data-driven insights, making it stand out in the crowded EHR marketplace. I believe it's best for those seeking advanced clinical decision support tools, as it uses a combination of advanced analytics and AI to facilitate clinical decisions.

Standout features and integrations:

Cerner's standout features include real-time analytics, advanced decision support tools, and a customizable interface. Its intelligent integrations, especially with diagnostic imaging systems, lab systems, and pharmacy systems, contribute to its powerful clinical decision support capabilities.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Customizable interface
  • Integrates well with other healthcare systems
  • Advanced decision support tools

Cons:

  • May require additional IT support
  • Has a steep learning curve
  • Can be expensive for smaller practices

Best for robust interoperability in large-scale clinics

  • From $299/user/month, (billed annually).

NextGen provides a powerful Electronic Health Record (EHR) system with a focus on enhancing communication within large-scale clinics. Given its capabilities to integrate diverse healthcare systems, it’s an exceptional choice for clinics requiring robust interoperability.

Why it's a good Practice Fusion alternative:

Upon evaluating various options, I determined that NextGen’s commitment to interoperability sets it apart. This trait is particularly important for larger clinics, where the need for seamless communication between numerous systems is paramount. NextGen is not just an EHR but a tool fostering collaboration, and that's why I picked it as the best for large-scale clinics requiring robust interoperability.

Standout features and integrations:

NextGen offers a range of impressive features, including customizable templates, an interactive patient portal, and revenue management tools. In addition to this, it places a premium on interoperability, supporting integrations with numerous healthcare systems, laboratories, and pharmacies, ensuring data exchange becomes an effortless process within a clinic’s network.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Features an interactive patient portal for enhanced engagement
  • Customizable templates adapt to specific needs
  • Offers high-level interoperability for large-scale clinics

Cons:

  • Can be overwhelming for smaller clinics due to extensive features
  • Interface may require a steep learning curve for some
  • Higher starting cost compared to other EHR systems

Best for therapy practices desiring intuitive scheduling

  • From $27/user/month (billed annually)

PowerDiary is an online practice management software primarily targeted at healthcare providers in the therapy space. It offers a range of features that streamline scheduling, billing, and communication processes, with a particular focus on simplifying and enhancing appointment management.

Why it's a good practice fusion alternative:

In my selection process, I included PowerDiary because it specifically targets and caters to therapy practices with features such as a straightforward scheduling system. This aspect makes it different from more generic medical practice management software. I determined it to be the 'Best for therapy practices desiring intuitive scheduling' because of its simple yet powerful scheduling system that can effectively handle the complexities of therapy appointments.

Standout features and integrations:

Some of the key features of PowerDiary include an intuitive calendar system, SMS reminders, online bookings, and telehealth capabilities. Moreover, PowerDiary supports integration with popular apps like Xero, Google Calendar, and Stripe, making it easier for therapy practices to synchronize their operations.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Customizable to suit therapy practice needs
  • Robust integration capabilities
  • Intuitive scheduling system

Cons:

  • Limited functionality beyond scheduling and patient management
  • Learning curve for non-tech savvy users
  • No free plan available

Best for psychiatrists desiring tailored EHR and practice management functions

  • From $39/user/month

Luminello is an electronic health record (EHR) and practice management software tailored to psychiatrists' needs. It streamlines appointment scheduling, billing, and clinical charting while offering features specific to mental health practice. Given this specificity, it makes an excellent choice for psychiatrists looking for EHR solutions designed with their practice in mind.

Why it's a good Practice Fusion alternative:

I picked Luminello because it's a software solution specifically created for mental health practitioners, providing unique value in this domain. It stands out due to the tailored psychiatric features that most EHR systems lack. This specialized focus positions Luminello as the ideal choice for psychiatrists seeking a comprehensive, specialty-specific EHR solution.

Standout features and integrations:

Luminello provides an array of features such as customizable intake forms, patient portal, prescription management, and appointment reminders. Moreover, it integrates with third-party applications like Stripe for secure online payments and Doxy.me for telepsychiatry appointments, among others.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Provides a range of features like appointment reminders and customizable intake forms
  • Allows integration with third-party applications like Stripe and Doxy.me
  • Tailored for mental health practitioners, offering specialty-specific features

Cons:

  • Its pricing may be higher compared to more generalized EHR systems
  • The specialty focus may limit usefulness for multi-specialty clinics
  • A smaller user community than more generalist EHRs might mean less peer support

Best for comprehensive healthcare IT solutions across specialties

  • Pricing upon request

Epic is a renowned provider of healthcare IT solutions that cover the vast landscape of patient care, from hospitals to specialty clinics. It's known for the breadth of its capabilities, making it an ideal choice for healthcare entities looking for an all-in-one solution that caters to a wide range of specialties.

Why it's a good Practice Fusion alternative:

I picked Epic for this list because it offers a comprehensive suite of features that are beneficial across many healthcare specialties. In comparing it to other tools, Epic stands out due to its scalability and adaptability to various healthcare scenarios. I opine it's best for comprehensive healthcare IT solutions across specialties because of its capacity to address the diverse needs of different healthcare areas.

Standout features and integrations:

Epic's noteworthy features include an integrated EHR system, practice management tools, and patient engagement modules. Its interoperability and functionality also helps in integrating with various healthcare systems, enabling seamless data flow for better patient care.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Strong integration capabilities
  • Scalable for any size of healthcare organization
  • Comprehensive and flexible software solution

Cons:

  • Implementation can be time-consuming
  • The complexity of the software may require significant training
  • Pricing information is not transparent

Other Practice Fusion Alternatives

Below is a list of additional practice fusion alternative that I shortlisted, but did not make it to the top 10. Definitely worth checking them out.

  1. Prompt EMR

    For rehab practices seeking compliance-oriented software

  2. Phreesia

    For those wanting automated patient intake solutions

  3. Pabau

    Good for health and beauty businesses requiring CRM

  4. RXNT

    Good for streamlined e-prescribing and EHR functions

  5. Insync

    Good for physical therapists needing specialized software

  6. Sevocity

    Good for small to mid-sized practices wanting customizable EHR

  7. Carepatron

    Good for health professionals seeking an easy-to-use care platform

  8. Jane

    Good for health practitioners needing comprehensive practice software

  9. HARMONY Medical

    Good for clinics needing bespoke electronic health records

  10. athenaOne

    Good for practices desiring cloud-based clinical management

  11. Compulink Healthcare Solutions

    Good for specialties desiring customized EHR solutions

  12. MEDITECH Expanse

    Good for hospitals requiring interoperable EHR

  13. Simple Practice

    Good for therapists seeking integrated practice management

  14. TheraNest

    Good for mental health providers needing practice management

  15. IntakeQ

    Good for practices wanting secure online patient intake forms

  16. CharmHealth

    Good for practices needing integrated EHR and practice management

  17. ChartLogic

    Good for specialties needing efficient electronic medical records

Selection Criteria For Practice Fusion Alternative

When selecting the right electronic health record (EHR) system for your medical practice, there are a number of key factors to consider. I've personally researched, tested, and compared dozens of EHR tools, focusing on factors that are critical to efficient, secure, and effective medical practice management.

Core Functionality

The core functions of an EHR system should enable you to:

  • Store patient health information digitally: These systems should efficiently store complete patient records, including medical history, diagnoses, medications, treatment plans, immunization dates, allergies, radiology images, and lab results.
  • Facilitate secure communication: The tool should provide a secure portal to facilitate communication between patients and healthcare providers.
  • Support decision making: The EHR system should support clinical decisions by providing access to complete patient information and evidence-based tools that providers can use to make decisions about a patient's care.

Key Features

When considering EHR tools, I specifically looked for the following key features:

  • Interoperability: This allows the system to exchange and make use of information with other EHR systems, ensuring seamless communication and coordination between different healthcare providers.
  • Mobile access: Given the nature of healthcare work, having mobile access to EHRs can be crucial for efficient patient care.
  • Customization: The EHR system should be flexible enough to be customized to the specific needs and workflows of your practice.
  • Regulatory compliance: The tool should comply with healthcare regulations such as HIPAA in the US to ensure the protection of patient information.

Usability

The design and usability of the EHR tool significantly impact its efficiency. For this type of tool, I looked at:

  • User interface: The tool should have an intuitive interface that doesn't require extensive training to understand. Icons and menus should be clearly labeled and easy to navigate.
  • Easy onboarding: The vendor should offer comprehensive onboarding and training resources to get your team up to speed quickly.
  • Quality of customer support: Given the importance of these systems, reliable customer support is crucial. This includes availability across multiple channels (email, phone, live chat) and timely response to queries.
  • Role-based access: The tool should allow you to easily set up role-based access to ensure that staff members can only access the information they need to do their jobs.

Remember, choosing an EHR system is a significant decision that impacts the efficiency of your practice and the quality of patient care. As such, it's crucial to take the time to assess your needs and review different systems to find the right fit.

Most Common Questions Regarding Practice Fusion Alternatives (FAQs)

What are the benefits of using Practice Fusion?

Practice Fusion offers numerous benefits for healthcare providers. First, it is a cloud-based EHR system, meaning it can be accessed from anywhere with an internet connection. Second, it has an easy-to-use, intuitive interface that doesn’t require much technical knowledge. Third, it provides a comprehensive suite of features that cover all aspects of healthcare practice management, including patient scheduling, billing, and reporting. Fourth, it offers telehealth capabilities, which are increasingly important in modern healthcare. Finally, it includes features for managing clinical tasks, such as e-prescribing and lab integration.

How much does Practice Fusion and its alternatives cost?

Practice Fusion used to be free but they switched to a subscription-based model in 2018. The cost is now $149 per user per month. The pricing of its alternatives vary widely depending on the specific features and the size of the practice. The starting price for alternatives often ranges from around $10 to $150 per user per month.

What are the pricing models for Practice Fusion alternatives?

The pricing models for Practice Fusion alternatives typically fall into two categories: subscription-based and quote-based. Subscription-based models charge a fixed monthly fee per user, often with different tiers of service that offer access to additional features. Quote-based models provide a custom quote based on the specific needs of your practice, such as the number of users and the features you require.

What is the typical range of pricing for Practice Fusion alternatives?

The typical range of pricing for Practice Fusion alternatives is wide, ranging from around $10 to $150 per user per month for subscription-based models. For quote-based models, the pricing can vary greatly based on your specific needs and the size of your practice.

Which are the cheapest and most expensive software options?

Among the Practice Fusion alternatives, Kareo is one of the cheapest, starting at $15 per user per month. On the other hand, solutions like AthenaHealth tend to be on the pricier end of the spectrum with costs typically starting at $140 per user per month.

Are there any free alternatives to Practice Fusion?

Yes, there are free alternatives to Practice Fusion. One of them is Hello Health, which offers a free version of their platform. However, it’s important to note that these free versions may have limitations and might not provide all the features required for comprehensive practice management.

Other Medical Software Reviews

Summary

In conclusion, choosing the right electronic health record (EHR) system for your medical practice involves careful consideration of several factors. Practice Fusion is a robust and comprehensive solution, but the various alternatives outlined in this guide provide a diverse range of capabilities and pricing models to fit different needs and budgets.

Here are three key takeaways to guide your decision-making process:

  1. Identify Core Functionality and Key Features: The right EHR system should provide the core functionalities you need, such as patient scheduling, billing, reporting, and clinical task management. Beyond these, consider unique features that could enhance your practice, such as telehealth capabilities, lab integration, or automated patient intake solutions.
  2. Consider Usability and User Experience: Not all EHR systems are created equal when it comes to usability. Choose a tool with an intuitive interface and a design that aligns with the workflows of your practice. Also, consider the quality of customer support and onboarding resources.
  3. Evaluate Pricing Models and Costs: EHR systems have varied pricing models, from subscription-based to quote-based. Consider your budget and the size of your practice when looking at pricing. Cheaper options may lack certain features, while more expensive solutions may offer extensive capabilities that you might not use. Remember to consider the potential return on investment in terms of improved efficiency and patient satisfaction.

What Do You Think?

As this field is constantly evolving, there may be other valuable Practice Fusion alternatives out there that we haven't mentioned. If you use a tool that you think deserves to be on this list, please let us know. Your input can help us keep this guide as comprehensive and useful as possible for our readers. We look forward to hearing from you and appreciate your insights.

John Payne
By John Payne

John Payne is the co-founder and company director of Symphony Health. With over 20 years of management experience John is working alongside his wife, Dr. Kate Payne to build a multi-site Medical Practice where staff work collaboratively for the good of their patients. John is passionate about improving access to quality Healthcare in North Vancouver and sharing best practice with other people managing medical practices.